After a mere 17 years at the helm at Soup, Dave “Slacker” Shoemaker is taking a month off—probably because he thinks he is a big shot now that he is moving to fancy-pants Cornell. Given that my role at Soup over the past 9 years has primarily been to irritate Shoe with my technical incompetence, » …Read more
Ryan Muldoon and I welcome you to the discussion of Natalie Gold‘s recent “The Limits of Commodification Arguments: Framing, motivation crowding, and shared valuations” (also available here). To kick off the discussion, » …Read more
[Editors’ note: This post is an abbreviated version of Piers Norris Turner’s introduction to the upcoming Utilitas symposium “Mill on Free Speech.” For this PEA Soup discussion, Cambridge Core has made all the symposium contributions available for free here. » …Read more
Welcome to our highly anticipated discussion of Sophia Dandelet‘s “Epistemic Coercion”, published in the most recent issue of Ethics. You can find the paper here. Ram Neta‘s critical précis is immediately below. Please join the discussion! » …Read more
We are excited to host Part II of the discussion of Jennifer Lackey’s 2020 book The Epistemology of Groups (Oxford).
The discussion is in two parts: Part I, posted here, addresses group attitudes, » …Read more
We are excited to host the following discussion of Jennifer Lackey’s 2020 book The Epistemology of Groups (Oxford).
The discussion is in two parts: Part I, posted here, addresses group attitudes, while Part II, to follow on Wednesday, » …Read more
Welcome to our Ethics Review Forum on Jonathan Quong‘s The Morality of Defensive Force (OUP 2020), reviewed by Joseph Bowen.
Below, you’ll find a description of the book, as well as a condensed version of Joseph’s review. » …Read more
As a present to our readers, and as an enticement to check out the new PEA Soup Princeton site, we present to you this lovely interview in our ongoing series “Mentees Interviewing Mentors.” Connie Rosati, co-editor-in-chief of Ethics and professor at UT Austin, » …Read more